Read and understand the case or question assigned. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Dedicate at least one heading to each following outline topic:
Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant]
Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case]
Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?]
Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns]
Explain the applicable law(s). Use the textbook here. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.
Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?]
Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision]
Do significant research outside of the book and demonstrate that you have in an obvious way. This refers to research beyond the legal research. This involves something about the parties or other interesting related area. Show something you have discovered about the case, parties or other important element from your own research. Be sure this is obvious and adds value beyond the legal reasoning of the case.
Dedicate 1 heading to each of the case question(s) immediately following the case, if there are any. Be sure to restate and fully answer the questions
Quality in terms of substance, form, grammar and context. Be entertaining! Use excellent visual material
Wrap up with a Conclusion. This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and your recommendations on the court’s ruling.
Include citations and a reference page with your sources. Use APA style citations and references
Submit your assignment
CASES TO CHOOSE FROM : (I don’t have a preference, choose 1 Case to analyze)
Week 4 – Cases to Assign_x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ Week 4_x000D_ _x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 1_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 9-3_x000D_ _x000D_ Audito v. City of Providence_x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 2_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 9-5_x000D_ _x000D_ The Private Movie Company, Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al._x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 3_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 9-6_x000D_ _x000D_ Stambovsky v. Ackley and Ellis Realty_x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 4_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 10-5_x000D_ _x000D_ Arrowhead School District No. 75, Park County, Montana v. James A. Klyap, Jr._x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 5_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 10-5_x000D_ _x000D_ Fitl v. Strek_x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 6_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 13-1_x000D_ _x000D_ Plum Creek v. Oleg Borman_x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 7_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 13-2_x000D_ _x000D_ Susette Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of New London, Connecticut, et al._x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 8_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 13-3_x000D_ _x000D_ Emine Bayram v. City of Binghamton and City of Binghamton Zoning Board of Appeals_x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 9_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 14-1_x000D_ _x000D_ Toys "R" Us, Inc., v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc._x000D_ _x000D_ Case Assignment 10_x000D_ _x000D_ CASE 14-2_x000D_ _x000D_ Victor Moseley and Kathy Moseley et al., dba Victor's Little Secret v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. et al._x000D_