Case Study Analysis/Summary 3-4 Pages APA format

Read and understand the case or question assigned. Show your Analysis and Reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. Dedicate at least one heading to each following outline topic:

Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant]

Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case]

Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?]

Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns]

Explain the applicable law(s). Use the textbook here. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.

Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?]

Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision]

Do significant research outside of the book and demonstrate that you have in an obvious way. This refers to research beyond the legal research. This involves something about the parties or other interesting related area. Show something you have discovered about the case, parties or other important element from your own research. Be sure this is obvious and adds value beyond the legal reasoning of the case.

Dedicate 1 heading to each of the case question(s) immediately following the case, if there are any. Be sure to restate and fully answer the questions

Quality in terms of substance, form, grammar and context. Be entertaining! Use excellent visual material

Wrap up with a Conclusion. This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and your recommendations on the court’s ruling.

Include citations and a reference page with your sources. Use APA style citations and references

Submit your assignment

CASES TO CHOOSE FROM : (I don’t have a preference, choose 1 Case to analyze)

Week 4 – Cases to Assign_x000D_
_x000D_
 _x000D_
_x000D_
Week 4_x000D_
_x000D_
 _x000D_
Case Assignment 1_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 9-3_x000D_
_x000D_
Audito v. City of Providence_x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 2_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 9-5_x000D_
_x000D_
The Private Movie Company, Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al._x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 3_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 9-6_x000D_
_x000D_
Stambovsky v. Ackley and Ellis Realty_x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 4_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 10-5_x000D_
_x000D_
Arrowhead School District No. 75, Park County, Montana v. James A. Klyap, Jr._x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 5_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 10-5_x000D_
_x000D_
Fitl v. Strek_x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 6_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 13-1_x000D_
_x000D_
Plum Creek v. Oleg Borman_x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 7_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 13-2_x000D_
_x000D_
Susette Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of New London, Connecticut, et al._x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 8_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 13-3_x000D_
_x000D_
Emine Bayram v. City of Binghamton and City of Binghamton Zoning Board of Appeals_x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 9_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 14-1_x000D_
_x000D_
Toys "R" Us, Inc., v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc._x000D_
_x000D_
Case Assignment 10_x000D_
_x000D_
CASE 14-2_x000D_
_x000D_
Victor Moseley and Kathy Moseley et al., dba Victor's Little Secret v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. et al._x000D_