OPS400 CSU Global Operation Supply Chain Management Paper

Once selected as a tutor I will give detailed instructions as to how to access the lab. FILLER TEXT

FILLER TEXT

Recommended

Yadavalli, V. S., & Balcou, C. (2017). A supply chain management model to optimise the sorting capability of a ‘third party logistics’ distribution centre. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(1), 77-84. Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/61749/Yadavalli_Supply_2017.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Ivanov, D., Mason, S. J., & Hartl, R. (2016). Supply chain dynamics, control and disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1114186
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031-5069. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467

Additional Resources

American Supplier Institute (ASI)
Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
Institute for Supply Management
Operations Management textbook companion website for the 11th and 12th editions

References

Heizer, J. Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). FILLER TEXTSustainability and supply chain management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management

Access the Pearson MyOMLab per the instructions located in the Course Information folder, titled: MyOMLab Student Guide. Carefully review the simulation’s introductory information and instructions, as these results will influence your grade by 10%.FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTAfter completing the simulation, capture a screen image of your final simulation results, which are to be included in your critical thinking operations management assignment as an appendix item.FILLER TEXTFILLER TEXTThe operations supply chain management assignment content must include the following:

Introduction: Explain the purpose or thesis of the paper and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support the purpose of the paper.
Provide a brief definition of supply chain management and identify why it is important in an organization’s operations.
Provide a brief overview description of the supply chain management simulation.
Describe your strategy for performing the supply chain management simulation.
Describe at least three operations supply chain management methods, principles, or techniques experienced in the supply chain management simulation.
Itemize at least three lessons learned from the supply chain management simulation.
Conclusion: Present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.
References: Include at least two current scholarly references (published within the past five years) in addition to the course text.
Appendix: Supply chain management simulation results. The appendix page should be its own page after your reference page, with the header: Appendix—with your screenshot below.

Submit your Critical Thinking assignment document(s) to the module submissions area established for this purpose. Per the assignment rubric, a portion of your evaluation is based on your simulation results.

Option #1: Operations Supply Chain Management PaperFILLER TEXT

This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:

Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.
Writing an operations supply chain management paper.

Your paper will require a structure that includes a strong title, followed by an introductory paragraph which generates interest and includes a thesis and mapping of what is to come.
Each of the sections should use appropriate APA headings, including a conclusion section.
Make sure that the body sections address each of the previous bullets.

Submission Requirements:

Your well-written paper should be four to six pages in length, not including the required cover and references pages.
Support your paper with at least four to six scholarly references (excluding all textbooks). Use current sources, not older than five years. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Format your paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).

Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.

Option #2: Operations Supply Chain Management PresentationFILLER TEXT

This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:

Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.
Creating a multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation.

Your multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation must contain logically cohesive flow including audio, video, and graphical content.
The length of the presentation, in addition to the title and reference portions, should be 10-12 slides (must include speaker notes), or five to seven minutes of narrated presentation (must include a transcript).
Please present your content clearly, concisely, and cohesively.
The presentation may be submitted as a completely self-contained file (e.g., PowerPoint, Prezi, Screencast-o-matic, Knovio, or Loom) or as a link to a hosted internet site.

Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.

Rubric

OPS400 Mod 7 CT

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Operations Supply Chain Management Simulation Performance

20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation

Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,002,000.

16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,008,000 and above $1,002,000.

12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation

Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,012,000 and above $1,008,000.

8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost above $1,012,000.

20.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples

15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

15.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 ptsFILLER TEXT

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.