Assignment: The skills you have been practicing throughout the course will be assessed in this paper and conclude with you constructing your own argument on a position. Your argument can be a contradiction, a support. Whichever you choose should be sufficiently supported with materials covered throughout the course and your own outside research.
In 1,000-1,500 words
- Summarize the position/argument researched and assess it for validity. This positions/argument should be presented in a clear logical form. This includes translating their rhetoric into: premises and a conclusion, identifying the category of propositions, and the quality and the quantity of the parts.
- Identify the assumptions of the position by drawing inferences from its communicated proposition to its position regarding human dignity.
- Construct a valid and sound argument that contradicts, challenges, or improves the position of the organization.
At least three academic peer-reviewed sources are required for this paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Paper must be Written well, with well supported thoughts (correctly)and make sure the argument has a premise and a conclusion!
This assignment measures programmatic competency
4.2: Examine the connections between ethical communication and human dignity.
4.4: Construct ethical arguments.
Sample Social Fallacies Link that can be used to write the paper